Why not? Because one of the goals of accounting is to accurately measure a business's gross income, expenses, and net income (earnings) during a given period of time, usually a year. If a business were allowed to reduce one year's gross income by an expense deduction for the total cost of an item that will be used for several years, the result would be an understatement of earnings in the year the asset was purchased, and an overstatement of earnings during the following years.
It follows that, for "capital assets" (assets that have a useful life of more than one year), the cost must be written off (that is, depreciated or amortized) over more than one year.
Theoretically, the cost of an asset should be deducted over the number of years that the asset will be used, according to the actual drop in value that the asset will suffer each year. At the end of each year, you could subtract all depreciation claimed to date from the cost of the asset, to arrive at the asset's "book value," which would be equal to its market value. At the end of the asset's useful life for the business, any undepreciated portion would represent the salvage value for which the asset could be sold or scrapped.
Since the actual drop in value of each business asset would be difficult and time-consuming to compute (if indeed it could be computed at all), accountants use a variety of conventions to approximate and standardize the depreciation process.
For example, the straight-line method assumes that the asset depreciates by an equal percentage of its original value for each year that it's used. In contrast, the declining balance method assumes that the asset depreciates more in the earlier years. The following table compares the depreciation amounts that would be available under these two methods, for a $1,000 asset that's expected to be used for five years and then sold for $100 in scrap.
| Straight-Line Method | Declining-Balance Method | |||
| Year | Annual Depreciation | Year-End Book Value | Annual Depreciation | Year-End Book Value |
| 1 | $900 x 20%=$180 | $1,000-$180=$820 | $1,000 x 40%=$400 | $1,000-$400=$600 |
| 2 | $900 x 20%=$180 | $820-$180=$640 | $600 x 40%=$240 | $600-$240=$360 |
| 3 | $900 x 20%=$180 | $640-$180=$460 | $360 x 40%=$144 | $360-144=$216 |
| 4 | $900 x 20%=$180 | $460-$180=$280 | $216 x 40%=$86.40 | $216-$86.40=$129.60 |
| 5 | $900 x 20%=$180 | $280-$180=$100 | $129.60 x 40%=$51.84 | $129.60-$51.84=$77.76 |
Capital Investment/Depreciation/R&D Expenditure
| No. | Item | The year ended March 31, 2005 | The year ended March 31, 2006 | The year ended March 31, 2007 | The year ended March 31, 2008 | The year ended March 31, 2009 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Capital investment* | 959,593 | 954,706 | 1,048,572 | 969,087 | 788,466 |
| Internal use assets | 382,189 | 397,419 | 522,974 | 512,428 | 424,064 | |
| Leasing assets | 577,404 | 557,287 | 525,598 | 456,659 | 364,402 | |
| 2 | Depreciation | 425,080 | 451,170 | 472,175 | 541,470 | 478,759 |
| Internal use assets | 313,884 | 329,684 | 346,431 | 417,270 | 392,234 | |
| Leasing assets | 111,196 | 121,486 | 125,744 | 124,200 | 86,525 | |
| 3 | R&D expenditure | 388,634 | 405,079 | 412,534 | 428,171 | 416,517 |
| Percentage of revenues | 4.3% | 4.3% | 4.0% | 3.8% | 4.2% |
- * Capital investment is completion basis, including leasing assets.
Number of Employees/Number of Consolidated Subsidiaries
| No. | Item | As of March 31, 2005 | As of March 31, 2006 | As of March 31, 2007 | As of March 31, 2008 | As of March 31, 2009 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Number of employees | 347,424 | 355,879 | 384,444 | 389,752 | 400,129 |
| Japan | 242,891 | 242,659 | 250,767 | 251,702 | 260,677 | |
| Outside Japan | 104,533 | 113,220 | 133,677 | 138,050 | 139,452 | |
| 2 | Number of consolidated subsidiaries* | 985 | 932 | 934 | 910 | 943 |
| Japan | 539 | 476 | 450 | 418 | 403 | |
| Outside Japan | 446 | 456 | 484 | 492 | 540 |
- * Including variable interest entities
Methods of depreciation
There are several methods for calculating depreciation, generally based on either the passage of time or the level of activity (or use) of the asset.[edit] Straight-line depreciation
Straight-line depreciation is the simplest and most-often-used technique, in which the company estimates the salvage value of the asset at the end of the period during which it will be used to generate revenues (useful life) and will expense a portion of original cost in equal increments over that period. The salvage value is an estimate of the value of the asset at the time it will be sold or disposed of; it may be zero or even negative. Salvage value is also known as scrap value or residual value.Straight-Line Method:
This table illustrates the straight-line method of depreciation. Book value at the beginning of the first year of depreciation is the original cost of the asset. At any time book value equals original cost minus accumulated depreciation.
Book Value = Original Cost - Accumulated Depreciation Book value at the end of year becomes book value at the beginning of next year. The asset is depreciated until the book value equals scrap value.
| Book Value - Beginning of Year | Depreciation Expense | Accumulated Depreciation | Book Value - End of Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| $17,000 (Original Cost) | $3,000 | $3,000 | $14,000 |
| $14,000 | $3,000 | $6,000 | $11,000 |
| $11,000 | $3,000 | $9,000 | $8,000 |
| $8,000 | $3,000 | $12,000 | $5,000 |
| $5,000 | $3,000 | $15,000 | $2,000 (Scrap Value) |
If a company chooses to depreciate an asset at a different rate from that used by the tax office then this generates a timing difference in the income statement due to the difference (at a point in time) between the taxation department's and company's view of the profit.
